Wrecking
Ball
MILEY CYRUS
In his review of Miley Cyrus’ music video for her hit
single, Wrecking Ball, Joseph R.
Atilano, a writer in the Entertainment section of The Inquirer, uses claims of
value to express the immoral and indecent nature of the video. He gives both
the song and the video a thumbs-down, arguing that the lyrics are shallow, the
song weak, and the music video widely inappropriate for young viewers. Atilano
questions what message Cyrus is trying to send to her fans in producing an
over-sexualized music video in which she is barely clothed and delivering very
suggestive double meanings in licking a sledgehammer and riding a wrecking
ball. He balances his attacks by ceding to the fact that Cyrus’ lyrics express
some sincerity in reflecting her personal struggles with the end of her recent
engagement and to the fact that she was one of the songwriters, which gave Wrecking Ball some credibility. Atilano
proceeds with his harsh critiques in countering his concessions, stating that
the song sounds like a standard pop song that one would hear on the radio. He
debases the song by indirectly stating that it has nothing of substance to it,
the video by calling it immoral and indecent, and Cyrus herself by portraying
her as another unoriginal and over-sexualized pop star. Atilano mocks Cyrus’
art and points out how ironic it is that she has released a single with a title
that labels her exactly for what she is – a wrecking ball.
No comments:
Post a Comment